|
I'd love to do a load test. Do you have a small CGI that I could test? I don't think we have the PTFs applied, and don't plan to. Just wait for V5R2. I find this hard to believe since the tests I did previously were so bad. I could tell it was a resource management problem, so if it has been fixed, I can see. Feel up to providing a CGI (really simple, just returning Hello World or something) on classis and pbA that I can load test on? 50, 100, then 150 hits? Brad On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 12:27:49 -0600 Mel Rothman <mel@rothmanweb.com> wrote: > Brad, a couple of days ago the lead developer of the HTTP > Server Powered by > Apache told me that since the PTFs released last > September and October, CGI > performance of the pbA server has been at least equal to > that of the classic > server. > > My subjective experiences on lightly loaded machines is > that the two servers' > CGI performance is comparable. > > > Mel Rothman > IBM eServer Custom Technology Center (CTC), Rochester, > Minnesota > http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/service/ctc/ > > > Brad Stone wrote: > > > > I reccomend to stay away from the pbA server until they > get > > the CGI performance up to par. It's horrific compared > to > > Classic. > > > > just my .02. > > > > Brad > > www.bvstools.com > > > > On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 23:10:02 -0500 > > "Joel R. Cochran" <jrc@masi-brac.com> wrote: > > > If you do this (which we did some time ago) be sure > you > > > have absolutely ALL > > > available cumulative PTFs and Group PTFs for the HTTP > > > server. When you > > > configure it, go ahead and switch over to the > "Powered by > > > Apache" Server. > > > It's not that you really get any immediate benefit, > but > > > as I understand it > > > that is where all the future enhancements will be and > a > > > new OS is the > > > easiest time to switch. Also it will open the door > for > > > using Tomcat and you > > > no longer have to track seperate Server Instance and > > > Server Configuration > > > names. > > > > > > Our V5R1 Internet Server box is a real champ... no > > > significant problems here > > > once configured properly (it is a little pickier than > the > > > previous version). > > > > > > Best Luck, > > > > > > Joel R. Cochran > > > Director of Internet Services > > > VamaNet.com > > > (800)480-8810 > > > mailto:custservice@vamanet.com > _______________________________________________ > This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) > mailing list > To post a message email: WEB400@midrange.com > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/web400 > or email: WEB400-request@midrange.com > Before posting, please take a moment to review the > archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/web400. > Bradley V. Stone BVS.Tools www.bvstools.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.