|
Joel, thanks for a very concise and comprehensive review of the basic forms of HTML interface. My only quibble is that there is a significant difference between the various sub-species of web serving. My personal preference, JSP, for example, is unique in that all web sessions run Java, and in fact all session served under a single web application share a common JVM. Because of the Java-centric architecture, a properly written servlet can easily be ported to another platform, thereby offloading the AS/400 of web serving responsibilities when circumstances warrant it. Note that I am not implying that all servlets are platform-neutral. I am saying that you CAN write them that way. RPG CGI, of course, is far less portable. ASP is also very implementation-specific, although from what I understand more and more platforms are supporting at least some subset of it. > From: Joel R. Cochran > > Solutions that claim to be technologically superior such as JSP, ASP, PHP, > flavor-of-the-month-P, are all still premised on the simple ideas above, > they simply go about number 3 in different ways, but the end goal > of all of these is to produce HTML output.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.