Re: commit control for an interactive web app, is this feasible -- WEB400

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


 >> Commitment Control really shouldn't require persistence.

How can this be Brad?  Unless you assume that all updates occur within one
message pair.  You can't even guarantee that you'll be connecting to the
same server job and therefore cannot guarantee the same AG.  Since the AG
is where the commitment control is "tied" how can it work?  I'd love you to
prove me wrong, I just don't see how the system would handle the mechanics
of it.   If Net.Data does it maybe it's somehow using a separate job to
handle the actual data access - or else it is using some form of
persistence under the hood.



+---
| This is the WEB400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to WEB400@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to WEB400-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to WEB400-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.