|
Too bad it still abandons COBOL. I know it's not a popular language, but it does get used and is supposedly supported. However, 9.8 is barely usable for working with COBOL--especially when SQL is involved. I go back to 9.6 when I really need to do something on an SQLCBLLE member in RDi.
Thanks,
Michael Quigley
Computer Services
http://www.t/
heway.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Csteve.ferrell%40fortra.com%7C53d751295c6f4
2d55d0108ddf0a05993%7Cca81e23b350945eea9983e346acf274d%7C0%7C0%7C63893
1293676993693%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIw
LjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C
%7C&sdata=hBHEVW4EbdqedNgIL2dXL16OghfArHS1fxh45aAq3Ng%3D&reserved=0
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.