Re: Speeding up parsing?

Hi Steve,

I'll try to do that...

In answer to your question, there's 15 /include files, 7 are very small (PR
for EXTPGM() calls)

I doubt any of the files are locked as they are in a build library, they
aren't used for anything but compiles.

Charles



On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 5:00 AM Steve Ferrell via WDSCI-L <
wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Charles,

I'd suggest contacting IBM Support so we can take a peek at the bottleneck.

Does your member contain a large number of /include or /copy files? Or
circular includes that don't use directives, so they get read every time
they are encountered?

Members cache if you have caching turned on, but includes and copy files
do not.

Are any of the 63 files locked on the system while you are running? Does
WRKOBJLCK on the files show any locks?

The numbers below aren't really that crazy, so something must be causing
the bottleneck.

Steve Ferrell
w. www.helpsystems.com

Program in question is ...
20,000 lines
63 files
46 or so record formats in the DSPF...

(crazy I know)

Charles

--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: https://amazon.midrange.com
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: https://amazon.midrange.com