|
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:31 AM Edmund Reinhardt
<edmund.reinhardt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
would
It has been RDi's philosophy so far to support either full seq + date
which is compatible with the IBM i members or straight source which
be compatible with IFS source.
While I understand that philosophy, I think it's more inflexible than
it needs to be. It is patently obvious that the source line dates
matter somewhat to some people, but equally obvious that the sequence
numbers absolutely do not matter at all to anyone.
Even lines that you don't touch might have to have their sequence
number changed, because you've inserted code elsewhere. So there is no
point in attempting to preserve them. There is no reason RDi couldn't
simply ignore the sequence number upon download and populate the
(recalculated) sequence number as needed upon upload to a source
member. This wouldn't introduce any "incompatibility" whatsoever with
source members.
John Y.
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: https://amazon.midrange.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.