×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




Tried your snippet, Mark. RDi 9.6 barfs, but 9.5 is OK with your code. Any over-excited parser - or maybe a PMR required?

Brian.

On 26/01/2018 16:41, Mark Murphy wrote:
RDi - 9.6.0.1
IBM i - 7.1

I have the following code

**free
ctl-opt Option(*SrcStmt : *NoDebugIo: *NoUnref)
DatFmt(*ISO) TimFmt(*ISO)
DftActGrp(*No) ActGrp(*New)
BndDir('JCS')
Main(JCUPDFLCYR);

...

dcl-s RunTime Time Inz(t'02.03.00');

...

The time literal causes the following errors in the LPEX editor:

Multiple markers at this line
- RNF3429E Initial value is not valid; parameter is ignored.
- RNF0306E The Time literal is not valid.
- RNF0607E Text is skipped to recover from the previous error.

It does compile properly though.

If I change my default time format to *HMS, and the time literal to
t'02:03:00', then RDi is happy (it also compiles properly). But I prefer to
keep my dates and times in *ISO format internally.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.