Re: RDi 9.6 Procedure wizzard

I think I've seen those "advisory" comments before - maybe if you select
the EXPORT option. Internal=only does not need it.

Vern


On 11/30/2017 9:57 AM, Justin Taylor wrote:

I agree. I don't see that header files for RPG add anything over using
compiler directives to bring in your prototypes.



-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Strong [mailto:darren@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 12:47 PM
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client
for System i & iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] RDi 9.6 Procedure wizzard

Not seeing it on my end. I personally find compiler directives a better
way to bring in prototypes from the actual target program source, rather
than use /copy books to a source member with just a prototype in it, so I
initially ran to see IBM directing people to use one solution to a problem
with multiple good solutions, but again, I'm not seeing it happen.



___________________________________
Darren Strong
Dekko

--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.