Re: Resistance to using RDi -- WDSCI-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Resistance to using RDi
From: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:18:52 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l/>
List-help: <mailto:wdsci-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries <wdsci-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:wdsci-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l>, <mailto:wdsci-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/wdsci-l>, <mailto:wdsci-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2/18/2016 12:04 AM, Booth Martin wrote:

I believe that focusing on those few items will convince most
programmers to give RDi a shot.

RDi has never been able to sell itself as being superior to SEU. Which
is why this thread (which I'm sorry I made morose) exists - we are
talking about /forcing programmers/ to use RDi because they otherwise won't.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Resistance to using RDi , Jon Paris

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.