Re: RDi 9.5 announcement

I'm 46, and I have not personally used them, an older sibling took an RPG class on 80 column cards in college. They are for wreaths in December, not clocking in to work, but I have done that in the past.

-----Original Message-----
From: WDSCI-L [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Greg Wilburn
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 1:40 PM
To: 'Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries' <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] RDi 9.5 announcement

Are punch cards those things that we clocked-in with about 20 years ago? I'm 47 and a I don't understand.

-----Original Message-----
From: WDSCI-L [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff Crosby
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 2:35 PM
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] RDi 9.5 announcement

I'm another.

96 column here at work.

80 column in college.


On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Jeff Young <jyoung0950@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Ken -
<fossil>
*I* remember punch cards.
96 column even.

NOW you know someone that used punch cards.

</fossil>

Jeff Young
Sr. Programmer Analyst

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Ken Killian <kkillian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Have heard of Word-Wrap? <smirk>

Why be tied to 60-year-plus 80-column old punch cards??? That every
RPG Developer I know has NEVER used punch cards!

Sorry, I don't know any fossil-type that wrote RPG code on Punch Cards.
That was WAY BEFORE my time! Thank goodness!

Speak of which, does the LPEX editor have a way to turn on Word-Wrap
like other editors?

Microsoft Visual Studio, Microsoft Word, NotePad++, just to name a
few that has word-wrap. Do we have that in RDi? I can't find it.

For XML documents, I use the horizontal scroll bar. Which is okay, I

guess.

I would love a ZOOM in/out on the LPEX Text size. But, I know there
is already a PFE out there for that. Maybe in next decade, we might
get

that.

<grin>

-Ken Killian-


-----Original Message-----

Vern, I'm all for the idea of more than 80, but if I ever had to
read

code

statements longer than about 120, I'd require a wrap-around
panoramic monitor (the single 21" flat screen just wouldn't cut it).
Let's keep it within a comfortable field of view, please. Just
because we can doesn't mean we should.

Michael Koester
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development
Studio Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list To post
a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or
change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.

--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development
Studio Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list To post a
message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or
change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.