|
Even your times are pretty sad though Joe don't you think?
I've done similar size downloads from Apple and other companies and rarely have to leave it running while I do other stuff.
It just saddens me that IBM who have such a big play on how important the web/cloud/etc. are constantly among the worst performers when it comes to web site and download performance. I just don't understand it.
On 2014-01-12, at 9:58 AM, Joe Pluta <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And that was both files. The smaller 800MB file took about 75 minutesJon Paris
(running at the same time as the big one) and then the big one finished
up in another 45 minutes or so.
This was Thursday I think. So maybe I was taking all the bandwidth. :)
Two hours for me.--
I just checked on the download I started yesterday. Let's say I started
the download at 8am.
2 ZIP files, DISK1 is 1.5 GB, DISK2 is 800MB.
DISK1 finished at 6am THIS morning - 22 hours
DISK2 finished at 5:30pm yesterday - 9.5 hours
Oy!
Or may I say? ENJ-Oy! Oy! Oy!
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
