×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Paul,
I have also had the issue you are talking about, but I was using
8.0.3. It seemed to happen when I was debugging code and then switched to
edit some source code. Never was able to consistently duplicate the
issue, so hard to bring up anything to IBM about what was causing it. Just
recently moved to RDI 9.0.0.1, so curious to see if I run into the issue
again. I will post something if I run into again on RDI 9. As for you
50% success rate we only have 5 programmers on the iSeries side and 2 use
RDI and 3 still use green screen. Figure new programmers will want to use
RDI and over time green screen coding will diminish.
Jeff Buening
Sr. Developer
P: 419.586.8599
| F: 419.586.6224
The information contained in this message (including any attachments) is
confidential and may be privileged.
Unauthorized disclosure, copying, or use of this information is prohibited and
may be unlawful.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and notify
the sender.
From: Paul Bailey <PaulBailey@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client
for System i & iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12/19/2013 06:16 AM
Subject: [WDSCI-L] Promoting WDSCi, RDp and/or RDi
Sent by: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
I've been using WDSCi/RDi/RDp (from now on, just RDi) for many years, and
I have been the primary (if not sole) driver in getting my colleagues to
use it.
In discussions with my colleagues I point out the features that make
things easier, the tools that could make their programming lives just a
little better. This is a tough argument because SEU/PDM still does things
that can't be done in RDi, but I usually have a 50% success rate in the
number of colleagues adopting RDi. The facts that SEU is now static even
if RPG is not, and the general usage of an Eclipse tool will help
advance/expand their careers and skillsets are also strong arguments. The
learning curve is a downside, but I try to skirt around that.
I'm under time constraints all the time. It takes an hour or more to
install and/or upgrade RDi and that time is often precious and needed
elsewhere, so at the moment I am the only user in my company using the
latest version (9.0.1). Two of my colleagues are still using v8.5 and
today *both* of them came across the bug where source was saved in RDi but
didn't turn up on the IBM i (no errors, the source just didn't get
transferred.) There were tantrums, rants and toys were thrown out of prams
(slight exaggeration, but you get the idea?) and now both are refusing to
use the tool until it is updated. Their faith in the tool, and in my
advice, has been damaged.
I guess I am just venting my frustration here and I apologise for bending
your ears (screens?) but I am just wondering how successful others are at
getting their colleagues to use the tool. What are your best arguments for
all the SEU-fanboi nay-saying, and how do you recover from faith-damaging
errors such as the one my colleagues suffered today?
-Paul.
PS Can I get some commission from IBM for being the only person in four
different companies over the past 10-15 years that has championed RDi?
Important, this email transmission and any files with it are strictly
confidential to the intended recipient and may be legally privileged. Any
views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of BHSF. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, disclose or distribute its contents in any
way. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
and delete the e-mail from your system.
We have taken steps to ensure this email and attachments are free from any
virus but do not accept any responsibility once this e-mail has been
transmitted. You should scan any attachments for viruses. No contract may
be concluded on behalf of BHSF Limited by e-mail.
Registered Office: BHSF Limited, Gamgee House, 2 Darnley Road, Birmingham,
B16 8TE. www.bhsf.co.uk Registered in England number 35500. BHSF Limited
is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.