×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I believe that the expression evaluation is done by the debugger on the
IBM i. You could confirm that by debugging in the green-screen and trying
the same expression...
Mike
Mike Hockings, M.Eng., P.Eng.
IBM Rational Developer for System z and Power Systems Software Technical
Support
IBM Canada Ltd. Laboratory
hockings@xxxxxxxxxx
voice 1-905-413-3199 T/L 313-3199 ITN 23133199
From: Sam_L <lennon_s_j@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
Date: 2013-09-01 18:27
Subject: [WDSCI-L] DBGE0001E Expression xxx is too complex
Sent by: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
I'm running RDP 8.5 against OS V7R1.
I have a line of code that says:
OutA(1).Units(In.Mth) += In.QTYSH;
In a service entry point debug session, when I hover anywhere over the
left hand side it get a Debug Engine Message:
DBGE0001E Expression OutA(1).Units is too complex.
I see a report of something similar back in WDSc and it looks like also
in 8.5.
(Trying to monitor OutA doesn't work either.)
Anyone know if this fixed in 9.0? Or is it a restriction on the
underlying debug engine in OS/400?
Thanks, Sam
The definitions are like this:
*=== Template for PSA100 records ==============================
ddsPSA100OUt E DS EXTNAME(PSA100:*OUTPUT)
d qualified
d Itnbr 13 overlay(dsPSA100Out:9)
d Units overlay(dsPSA100Out:22)
d like(SUNT01)
d dim(12)
*=== Arrary of PSA100 Record are built here ===================
d OutA ds likeds(dsPSA100Out)
d dim(99)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.