× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. WDSCI-L
  3. October 2012

Re: To be under Indicators or not to be

On 2012/10/1 3:30 PM, Daron Whitehouse wrote:

The following snippet is a mapped named indicator example (there are other methods):
// named indicators
D p_Indicators S * Inz(%Addr(*In))
D indicators DS Based(p_Indicators)
D In01thru65 65A Overlay(indicators)
D inputUL 1N Overlay(indicators: *Next)


Daron, your indicators DS isn't necessarily always mapped to the *IN indicators. Your p_Indicators pointer could be set to point to some other storage.

Any human can tell that the "indicators" DS is mapped over *IN, but it's not _officially_ mapped over *IN.

So unfortunately, the concept of a mapped named indicator doesn't really exist.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.