Re: To be under Indicators or not to be

[Daron Whitehouse <dwhitehouse@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I 2nd that motion.

Daron



Daron Whitehouse
Systems and Programming Manager
Madico Inc
64 Industrial Parkway
Woburn,MA 01801
781-935-7850 X-196
dwhitehouse@xxxxxxxxxx
www.madico.com





Notice of Confidentiality

This e-mail and any attachments thereto are intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may be proprietary and/or legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, without the prior written permission of the sender is strictly prohibited.  If you receive this email in error, please immediately telephone or email the sender and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of this mail, and any printout thereof.

The contents of an attachment to this email may contain software viruses that could damage your own computer system.  While Madico has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, we cannot accept liability for any damage that you sustain as a result of software viruses.  You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment.





-----Original Message-----
From: Stuart Rowe [mailto:rowestu@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 5:34 PM
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] To be under Indicators or not to be

I almost never use the outline (except to enable content assist) but still I'd like to see "Fields" called "Variables" and list everything there.
"Fields"?  I dropped that term with RPGII.

Stu


On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Terry Hertel <T.Hertel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> While I haven't used this feature in the past, I agree with Mike. If I
> use this feature in the future, I would likely look in the fields
> section first because it may not be apparent what data type it is. I
> like the idea of keeping system reserved indicators in the indicators
> section and having named indicators in the fields section.
>
> One of the things I like about this forum is that it reveals features
> that I haven't used or discovered yet. The whole global definitions
> section is largely an untapped resource for me, and one of the posts
> jogged my memory about using content assist. Good stuff.
> ------------------------------
>
> message: 2
> date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:15:20 -0500
> from: Mike Kohlndorfer <MKohlndorfer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] To be under Indicators or not to be
>
> I would prefer named indicators be listed as fields, while system reserved
> indicators (*INxx, LR, etc) stay under indicators.   A named indicator does
> not jump out as an indicator unless you spend time analyzing how it is
> used;  system indicators are more obvious.
>
> If listed as a field, the data type is shown to the right, making it
> easier to recognize.
>
> Michael Kohlndorfer
> 630-766-4445  x17399
> --
> This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development
> Studio Client for System i & iSeries  (WDSCI-L) mailing list To post a
> message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or
> change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
> or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
> moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.