×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
... where they can play with the pencils, while I fail to find named indicators among the fields.
I agree with Gary about pre-defined indicators (and thanks for the memories).
But as for the named indicators, my vote would be to have them with the fields.
Thanks for asking, Edmund.
Michael Koester
~~~~~~~~~~~~
-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gary Thompson
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 8:33 AM
I prefer to keep pre-defined indicators segregated; on the "group W bench" bench as it were.
-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Edmund Reinhardt
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 10:36 AM
To: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [WDSCI-L] To be under Indicators or not to be
Ken's question about where in the Outline view to find named indicators has stirred things up a bit.
We would like to know if there is a strong preference to move Named indicators under the Fields heading so that all fields can be found in one place and only predefined indicator usage being shown under the Indicators heading.
On the other hand would anyone be upset about not finding the Named indicators under the Indicators heading any more?
IBM is listening.
Regards,
Edmund (E.H.) Reinhardt
COBOL IDE on AIX, DDS, WebFacing, System i Application Development, Rational Developer for Power
midrange.com
