× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




Hi Jon
Believe me, we are well aware of the strong desire of certain people to run
on Macs :-)
It turns out that your are in good company and 2 of our architects run on
Macs as well.

As you astutely pointed out, having the RPG rich editing independent of PV
means we can get that function on the Mac without porting those native
DLLs.
1) This is only part of the problem. We need to get all of our
dependencies to support Mac. However I am hearing some good news on this
front.
2) I was under the impression that Program Verifier is still important
functionality. Are you saying that you would get the same error feedback
from compiles and that you don't really see PV as critical function?

How do the rest of you feel about the importance of Program Verifier?


Regards,



Edmund (E.H.) Reinhardt
COBOL IDE on AIX, DDS, WebFacing, System i Application Development,
Rational Developer for Power



2D barcode - Phone: 1-905-413-3125 | Phone: 1-905-854-6195 IBM
encoded with E-mail: edmund.reinhardt@xxxxxxxxxx
contact AIX COBOL: 8200 Warden Ave
information www.youtube.com/user/IBMRational#g/c/62DF24D5BCD43501 Markham, ON L6G 1C7
"In every thing give thanks: for this is the will of Canada
God in Christ Jesus concerning you." - 1
Thessalonians 5:18






From: Jon Paris <jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
Date: 06/21/2012 02:01 PM
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] field attributes in Outline view RDP V8.5
Sent by: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx




On 2012-06-21, at 1:00 PM, wdsci-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

So what we have done is write a parser from scratch that will compute all
the information on the fly and it reuses information from the IBM i (like
file record/field information) from the last call. In this fashion we
can
update the information on each keystroke. We have the flexibility to
improve and add more information that the program verifier did not
compute.
However, it will take a while before we tweak it to behave just like the
compiler.

So this should help in portability and increase the chances of getting a
Mac version?

Please, please - pretty please. I would _love_ to dump WIndows completely.


Jon Paris

www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com




--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.