×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Thanks for the response. I did respond to my manager that I felt a 3-year SWMA was safe, and that our BP should verify that it would work as expected.
I also pushed to get this done through PPA... here's hoping.
I'm sitting with a number of things to open PMRs about. :)
-Kurt
-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Buck
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 9:31 AM
To: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] RDp SWMA
On 2/14/2012 10:35 AM, Kurt Anderson wrote:
Let's say that in two years RDp becomes something else like RDx, would a 3-year SWMA contract over RDp apply to the hypothetical RDx?
3-year is the deal, and I'm definitely leaning toward it, but want to make sure it upscales before I go to my manager asking for a 3-year contract.
Based on the way things went with WDSC, I'd say a 3 year SWMA on RDP will get us 3 years of maintenance on RDP but not any hypothetical follow-on product.
The difference is that WDSC was a no-charge item, while RDP is chargeable. It is speculation whether Rational will give us entitlements (or not) to any hypothetical successor to RDP. But I'm guessing that my SWMA will not transfer to a successor IDE.
--buck
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
midrange.com
