× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



+1

-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jerry C. Adams
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 12:52 PM
To: 'Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for
System i & iSeries'
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Replies to Replies to Replies .......

I, too, like seeing the thread for the same reason. Sometimes the
<snip></snip> does not contain enough for me to decipher what is being
referenced.

I don't mind the in-line comments, even prefer them - as long as the
responder says something like "Comments in-line." Can even be more
meaningful (or, at least, easier to read) in a lengthy message.

Just goes to show that you can't please everyone!

Jerry C. Adams
IBM i Programmer/Analyst
In order for things to stay the same, everything will have to change.
-Giuseppe Tomasi de Lampedusa
--
A&K Wholesale
Murfreesboro, TN
615-867-5070


-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Kurt Anderson
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 11:58 AM
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for
System i & iSeries
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Replies to Replies to Replies .......

I like having all the responses within the email so I can reference what was
said earlier, and quickly. What I don't like is when the person's response
is hidden within those earlier messages. Sometimes it's quite clear and
apparent, otherwise I can't distinguish between the 'in-line' response and a
quoted message. Likely due to Outlook's formatting. Unless the response is
to specifically to me and I feel I should attempt to decipher the response,
I pretty much always delete 'in-line' responses w/o reading them.

-Kurt
-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jeff Crosby
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 11:38 AM
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for
System i & iSeries
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Replies to Replies to Replies .......

Same for me, Mike. But I'll try to do better.

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Mike Wills <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The problem for me? (I'll admit, I am guilty) is that Gmail hides all
of the duplicate content so I forget about it. I'll try to remember.
--
Mike Wills
You shouldn't be reading this line!
--
Jeff Crosby
VP Information Systems
UniPro FoodService/Dilgard
P.O. Box 13369
Ft. Wayne, IN 46868-3369
260-422-7531
www.dilgardfoods.com

The opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily the opinion of my
company.  Unless I say so.
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list To post a message
email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list
options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.