×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I for one do NOT want to vote for every enhancement, which is why I
suggested the option of a 'don't care' status. The purpose of that is so I
don't waste time looking at the same suggestions again and again. When the
only statuses are voted for and haven't voted, I have to keep track myself
of the ones I don't care about, which is not user friendly.
Note that 'don't care' means exactly that - I'm not voting against the
suggestion, just saying it's not important to me. The (relatively few) that
I vote for are the ones I want to see worked on.
Dave Shaw
Mohawk Industries
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:07 PM
To: "Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client
forSystem i & iSeries" <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Do Vote on Enhancements! (was Cost of RDP)
Not to minimize the UI issue, do you really want to vote for 100
enhancements? If everyone votes for all enhancement, then effectively
nobody votes for anything.
Personally, I liked the old $100 RPG enhancement budget. Makes you
think about what you want to pick.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
