Re: Do Vote on Enhancements! (was Cost of RDP)

I for one do NOT want to vote for every enhancement, which is why I suggested the option of a 'don't care' status. The purpose of that is so I don't waste time looking at the same suggestions again and again. When the only statuses are voted for and haven't voted, I have to keep track myself of the ones I don't care about, which is not user friendly.

Note that 'don't care' means exactly that - I'm not voting against the suggestion, just saying it's not important to me. The (relatively few) that I vote for are the ones I want to see worked on.

Dave Shaw
Mohawk Industries

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:07 PM
To: "Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client forSystem i & iSeries" <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Do Vote on Enhancements! (was Cost of RDP)

Not to minimize the UI issue, do you really want to vote for 100
enhancements? If everyone votes for all enhancement, then effectively
nobody votes for anything.

Personally, I liked the old $100 RPG enhancement budget. Makes you
think about what you want to pick.