× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



We also use embedded SQL with WDSC 7 against V5R4 with no problems and
like the others said I don't think there's an additional cost with WDSC
7 but may be on the later versions of RDi.

-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Rick.Chevalier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 8:33 AM
To: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] The SAGA or is it Soap Opera Continues

I will second Dave Shaw. Move to WDSC 7 if you are truly on WDSC 6.
Many of the people on this list and the Midrange-L list use imbedded SQL
heavily and develop using WDSC without issues, myself included. We are
also a V5R4 shop.

Rick


-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of frank kolmann
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 5:50 PM
To: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [WDSCI-L] The SAGA or is it Soap Opera Continues

Hi

I hope someone has an answer.
I am having problems compiling modular programs that use embedded SQL.

I have begged, cajoled, pleaded and bullied programmers to use WDSCi.
Why, they asked, we can Edit Code with SEU more quickly than with WDSCi.
As reasons I extolled the increased productivity, modular code, reusable
code that results.
I have even convinced my management to stump up $2K per coder for the
whiz bang latest and greatest RDi.
I cited the improved productivity of the coders, and that we may even
reduce programmer costs.

Well it is time to pay the piper. Management wants the increased
productivity/cost savings.
I have NOT delivered.
I have set up reusable modules and designed service routines but guess
what I have also taken up the 'SQL is the Way' crusade.
For the life of me I CANNOT get the reusable RPG modules that ALSO use
embedded SQL to compile.
Precomplier insists that Host variables are unique EVEN ACROSS MODULES.
Worse yet Precompiler rejects LOCAL Host Variables as UNUSABLE.
AAAAAARRRRRGGGGHHH!!!
The SEU'ers call me Don Frank, thanks IBM, I am now a laughing stock.

The WDSCi verifier is worse than useless with the modular/SQL code.
I use PDM/SEU for all my compilations. I need to eat crow every time I
do a compile.

I dont think I am the only one with this problem, I see many references
on the net to a change done to the 'beloved by me[sic];' SQL RPG
precompiler at V5R3.

Has anyone found the way and enlighten me, I would be eternally
thankful.
Perhaps then I need not consider taking up the 'way of the samurai'.

We are on V5R4, WDSCi V6.

Privileged and Confidential. This e-mail, and any attachments there to,
is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may
contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify me immediately by a return e-mail
and delete this e-mail. You are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail and/or any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.