×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I did not close WDSc between searches. Both searches returned the same number of results. My filter specifies Library: libName, File: *, Member: *; the same as my CTL-H search.
The progress dialog is different for the two searches. The filter search lists each individual member and "Processing results..." after every one, like it processes them one at a time. The CTL-H search does not list individual members.
message: 4
date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:44:27 -0600
from: Jim Essinger <dilbernator@xxxxxxxxx>
subject: [WDSCI-L] WDSC iSeries Search - was WDSCI-L Digest, Vol 7,
Issue 245
Did you close WDSC and restart between searches? Since they both do the
same thing, I am surprised that there would be that much difference in run
time. If you did the exact same search with the right click twice, is the
1st one slower then the 2nd?
Jim
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
