|
On 25-Jun-08, at 10:24 AM, Aaron Bartell wrote:
IBM team, could this be changed to only require WDSC/RDi to be shut
down
when the update is actually taking place vs. including the download
time in
the update process?
Instead of that Aaron, how about IBM supplying an update site that
performs at more than a snails pace?
Several times in the past I have downloaded large files from Apple,
MS, and various other vendors - _none_ of them are ever as slow as the
IBM sites.
So IBM - if you're going to send out these huge updates, how about
using something with a bit more power than the TRS-80 that seems to be
running the service now!
Jon Paris
www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.