|
I have not found that many features in 3.3 or 3.4 which I was missing in the 3.2 in WSDCi, so it is primarily as the underlying abstraction has moved from "each unit must be a File" to "each unit must be an URL", which has made me look at how hard it would be to implement.
I can understand why you would want to go to a more current Eclipse, being a Java developer. If you're interested in EGL, look at http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/reglrws It's the alphaWorks IBM Rational EGL Rich Web Support page. I don't need EGL and will probably never use it, so most of what EGL offers is strange to me. Maybe you'll get some use of it though.
Would appreciate your report on how easy/hard it was to move from WDSC / Eclipse 3.2 to standard Eclipse 3.4.Right now I integrate web stuff with Cobol using MyEclipse 6.0.1 and use WSDCi to grab spool files and IFS files from remote systems. Works ok.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.