Just look at what happened with their first stab at named user licensing
for the new 515 and 525 i5 models... it was switched to concurrent based
licensing virtually before the boxes even hit the street! For this type of
product (especially considering how it has been treated to date in terms of
licensing), concurrent licensing is definitely the way to go.
"Dave Shaw"
<daveshaw@bellsou
th.net> To
Sent by: "Websphere Development Studio
wdsci-l-bounces@m Client for iSeries"
idrange.com <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
02/15/2008 09:54 Subject
AM Re: [WDSCI-L] ADTS V6R1 - No SEU
updates?
Please respond to
Websphere
Development
Studio Client for
iSeries
<wdsci-l@midrange
.com>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Buck" <kc2hiz@xxxxxxxxx>
Newsgroups: midrange.wdsci-l
To: <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] ADTS V6R1 - No SEU updates?
<snip>
Regarding SEU, not only developers use SEU here. We have a full time
operator who uses it to edit FMTDTA specs and the like. We also have
two people who serve as his backup when he's on holiday. That's three
additional seats for ADTS, right?
--buck
Which is one of the reasons why named licensing will be a disaster.
Another
is employee turnover in a shop the size of mine. We need to convince IBM
that concurrent licensing is the right way to go.
Dave Shaw
Mohawk Industries
--
This is the Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries (WDSCI-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at
http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
For more information please visit
http://www.ers.ibm.com
_____________________________________________________________________________
midrange.com
