|
I mostly responded to Joe Pluta's notion of calling for an additional "tax" on PDM users for "staying in the past". Joe challenged IBM's move to unbundle RDi from other tool offerings, and when that didn't work, he called for a "tax".What? You have got to be the most bizarre interpreter of my writings.
I think IBM is doing the right thing by charging separately for PDM and RDi. Some of us resent subsidizing tools that we'd rather not use. But I don't expect my opinion to be popular on a WDSCi list.I think what IBM is doing is correct as well. I've said that repeatedly, publicly, before you did. I just do it while managing to avoid words like "resent" and phrases like "when that didn't work" because they are problematic in a mailing list. They're fraught with negative connotations and they simply raise the static level with no benefit to anyone. However, you seem to enjoy that sort of friction, so I don't expect you'll stop now. But that's just my opinion.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.