× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Luis Colorado wrote:
Vern, you wrote:

The RSE Extensions are next best for me, but they strip the source sequence and source change date. Sequence is not such a big deal, but change date can be. That will be a loss, in my view, when going to editing in IFS and using subversion, etc.

Subversion doesn't use the RSE extensions. When you use Subversion (and I assume that the same applies to CVS) you keep the sequence number and change dates. The merge is really easy to use.

I haven't been stripping the dates/sequence numbers when committing my source to Subversion, but I had thought that I would want to if I started versioning all my source instead of just my own work on a particular project.

The reason I'd want to strip the date/sequence is to avoid "false positives" when comparing two versions. I'm thinking of the sort of thing that Vern mentioned earlier, in which I the sequence numbers or dates of some lines change without the actual code changing. Is there some way to tell the Subversion server to ignore the first X bytes when calculating the diff?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.