× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I have a field named PM_MAIN, it is used and defined in 2 spots in the
program. It is first defied/used at 026805 and then defined/used at
031906.
When you click on the field name in the outline, you are brought to line
026805 in the source. When you click on the "360 (D)", you are brought to
line 031906. My first question is why the first reference at 284 (aka
026805) not shown when expanded. My second question is: can a change be
made to use the 284 / 360 line sequence numbers rather than the 26805 /
031906 as stored in the source without re-sequencing the source, or can
the outline be configured to use the 26805 / 031906 rather than the 284 /
360 line sequence numbers? It would be nice to have the outline sequence
numbers match the source sequence numbers.


Al Slezak
Information Systems Division / NEWS Group
Phone: (630) 451-7433
Fax: (630) 451-7401
Albert_Slezak@xxxxxxxxxx
Making the Magic Happen

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.