|
On 2-Nov-07, at 3:42 PM, wdsci-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Yes, sometimes you wonder at the decisions made from above.
The decision to not enhance VARPG was effectively made by its non- users - not really by IBM. Despite being "free" it was ignored by the vast majority despite being promoted at COMMON and other User events for years. Sure there was more IBM could have done with it, but they constantly updated its compiler support, added Java generation capability, and more. Still people stayed away in their thousands.
Pity - it was a fun product - but the market spoke!
Jon Paris
www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.