Personally I never have many problems with code anymore, though I am sure
there were some to start with. As to losing a days worth of work, I also
would never work for 4 hours on a project without doing the occasional
save. Beside the fact that I am working on a windows machine, power goes
out occasionally, and many things cause stuff to be lost if not saved in a
timely manner.
I know this won't change your mind, but, don't wait for a better version
of Code. That isn't going to happen, The new version is not Code and if it
gets released in the free version will have it's own learning curve and
problems. Remember the version out now is just a technology preview.
"Holden Tommy" <Tommy.Holden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
05/17/2007 03:38 PM
Please respond to
Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To
"Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries" <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: [WDSCI-L] Continued CODE Issues
Personally (ducking the rocks) I still use SDA for all my display files.
I tried CODE (and yes it works...) but from my opinion SDA is just
better. I'll give the new WDSC integrated one when it's a part of the
basic package and performs at least as well as SDA (or better). Plus at
this time learning CODE for displays is going to be a waste of time
since it's going the way of the dinosaur...stick with SDA and wait for
it's replacement...again this is JMO!!!
<puts on flame-retardant clothing>
Thanks,
Tommy Holden
-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Bill Barnes
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 3:13 PM
To: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [WDSCI-L] Continued CODE Issues
I am really trying to use this product but keep running into road
blocks. The latest is that today I was designing a screen to replace
one already being used. I worked about 4 hours figuring out what fields
needed to stay and which ones needed to be removed. I had the first
screen 2/3 done when I got a little message saying there was a problem
with CODE and did I want to send the error report. At that point
everything went away. Add that to my 4 hours lost yesterday comes t a
full day of work into the bit bucket. This is unacceptable in my
estimation. If and when IBM decides to let the riff raff use the NAI
version of CODE I will try it on something small. In direct
contradiction to those that love it I would caution anyone contemplating
using this tool to STAY AWAY, at least for now. I am too old to be
losing days.
Thanks
Bill Barnes
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.