× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Eric,

I'm thinking it may be something else because the iSeries does support
the use of a substr in the "Order by..." clause, I've used this a number
of times before, i.e. "order by '    ' || ltrim(a.yaoemp)" and "order by
substr(rtrim(excmd), 1, 20)" both work on our V5R3M0.

Douglas Belcher
KV Pharmaceutical
St Louis, MO
Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of my employer


-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of DeLong, Eric
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 3:59 PM
To: Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] How Come

Hmm, your order by uses substr....  I'd probably change this to ORDER BY
1, which refers to the first column in the result set....  I know that
order by works with ordinal values.....  I didn't think you could do
expressions in the order by clause.....

-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Bill Barnes
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 11:48 AM
To: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [WDSCI-L] How Come




P Decl_Saexpom    B

      /FREE

       EXEC SQL

        Declare SAEXPOM

        Cursor for

         SELECT SUBSTR(SAEXPO,1,4) AS STORE, 

                SUBSTR(SAEXPO,5,8) AS DATE, 

                SUBSTR(SAEXPO,13,4) AS CODE, 

                SUBSTR(SAEXPO,15,2) AS Codesfx,

                SUBSTR(SAEXPO,17,12) AS AMOUNT

         FROM SAEXPOM

         WHERE SUBSTR(SAEXPO,13,4)
IN('1250','1260','1450','1460','2050','2060','2450','2460')

           AND SUBSTR(SAEXPO,1,4) >= ' 100'

SQL0104 Token SUBSTR was not valid. Valid tokens: ) ,

         ORDER BY SUBSTR(SAEXPO,1,4);

 

 

The above is strange and happens fairly regularly.  The statement is not
in error and executes just fine.  How come?

Thanks

Bill Barnes

The above works if I change it to fixed form.  Obviously another RPG/SQL
problem.  Is it just me or is IBM having a lot of issues with embedded
SQL and they have spilled over into RSE?

--
This is the Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries  (WDSCI-L)
mailing list To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.