|
Let me clarify: I don't doubt you're having a problem. I personally use CAX 5.1 through the Internet on 20 boxes scattered all over the U.S. and Canada; two shops have two and all other shops have one. There are multiple OS/400 releases on small to medium-size boxes. My staff, all using CAX 5.1 on Win2K, work on a wider scope. I'm doing coding (SEU, SDA) and testing; I'm hitting that enter key pretty hard. We have never observed any delay unrelated to iSeries and/or Internet/network traffic. I'd expect a statistically significant number of users on multiple Win2K desktops working on multiple systems to report frequent hangs. If you're having a problem, I suggest using Norton Utilities (or something of that ilk) to clear disk clutter (including your TEMP folders) and to defrag your disks. Make sure your Win2K SP's are up-to-date. Don't forget to check for rogue applications with the Windows task monitor. I suffered from audio dropouts for months until I ran the Win2K performance monitor and found Windows was trying to reconnect to a phantom device every seven seconds. I deleted the device and my problem was solved. I have seen performance problems related to the use of "dumb" hubs instead of "smart" switches, or from improperly-configured network devices. A network specialist ought to be able to check for collisions or excessive retries. -reeve > -----Original Message----- > From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Frank.Kolmann@xxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 5:23 PM > To: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [WDSCI-L] Client Access and Win 2000 (poor performance) > > > > > > > I must beg to differ. I have 2 PCs beside each other. > We are on an 825 V5R2 and I have up to date versions on CAE. > The 825 has more capacity then we use. It is not the cause. > The CPU usage mostly is <10% rarely goes to 60% (dual processor). > The CAE on Win2000 PC suffers periodic delays of about 1-3 seconds > , the same function on Win98 has negligible delay. > The delay is not consistant. There will be say 3 or 4 good reponses > followed by the delay. It is very annoying and not an urban myth. > > Frank Kolmann > > >date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:03:44 -0500 > >from: "Reeve" <news@xxxxxxxxxx> > >"Client Access has poor performance under Win2000"? Not as far as I know > or > >have experienced; I think this is an urban legend. Make sure you apply > the > >current CAX service pack. > > _______________________________________________ > This is the Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list > To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l > or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.