|
Vern. Good catch! Yes Outline view is in 5.0 and we are proud of it. The presentation has been updated since and infact I am still working on updating it and adding more of teh version 5.0 additions. Stay tuned... I am hoping to finish working on it by end of the week. I will post another note when I am done and when I replace the outdated one on the web. Thanks for pointing this out. ====================================================== George N. Farr iSeries eclipse IDE, iSeries education, and RPG Compilers Development manager ----- Forwarded by George Farr/Toronto/IBM on 05/29/2003 12:18 PM ----- |---------+------------------------------------> | | Vern Hamberg | | | <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx| | | nology.com> | | | Sent by: | | | wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxx| | | com | | | | | | | | | 05/28/2003 05:10 PM | | | Please respond to | | | Websphere Development | | | Studio Client for iSeries| | | | |---------+------------------------------------> >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> | | cc: | | Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Rexx | | | | | >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Phil In the presentation at < ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/as400/products/ad/wdt400/cmn200303/SP15-EclipseToolingForRPGandCOBOL.pdf > foil 21, it says "What is yet to come: REXX macros". Right beneath that is "Outline view support", which seems to be here. This IS your presentation (with others). It appears to be from 2002. Just wondering - Vern At 04:39 PM 5/28/2003 -0400, you wrote: >There have been a few questions posted about REXX support in WDSC. The >bottom line is yes, I think >we could support it as a scripting language for the editor, at least. We >have it on our list as something >to evaluate eventually. Some of the tricky areas will be that REXX is not a >GUI language, other than >the one dialog you can use with LINEREAD (and that's not rexx, but lpex). >That's why in CODE we were >moving more towards Java, although it was bold-on support there (eg, all >static methods that used JNI >to talk to the editor which is written in C), and now that the editor is >written in Java and lives in an >extensible IDE written in Java ... well, you get the point. > >However, Jon is somewhat correct some of the time :-). Yes, Java being a >rich and typed language >can be more verbous than REXX which is loosely typed and designed for >simple scripting requirements, >which in fact is a large percentage of what we do when writing editor >extensions. While taking the time >to learn the eclipse Java APIs and the JLpex Java APIs is a great strategic >plan, and a good excuse >to learn Java before re-writing payroll, we do recognize a simpler >scripting language is important for the >out of box experience. "Its on our list" is all I can say, and the recent >flurry of discussion on it has helped >its priority. > >Phil Coulthard, iSeries AD, IBM Canada Ltd. coulthar@xxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ This is the Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.