× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. WDSCI-L
  3. April 2003

Re: Fw: WDSC standard versus Advanced

> From: Phil Coulthard
>
> The primary differences in WSAD vs WSSD is advanced J2EE
> tooling, including exhaustive support for EJBs and MDBs.

This makes perfect sense to me, and if as you say WDScAEi is basically WDSC
+ the WSAD enhancements, then I'm all good.


> -WSSD (and hence WDSC std) has all the built-in test environments for 4.0,
> 5.0
> and 5.0 express. They both support TomCat if you install TomCat locally.

This was my big kicker, and what got me started on the whole comparison.
Had I not noticed that the test environments were missing from the standard
version, I wouldn't have even bothered with the posting.  For me, EJBs are
not an issue, and my position should be obvious vis-a-vis Webfacing support.

As it is, I'm glad I did bring it up, if for nothing else than to get the
right information.  Thanks for the clarification, Phil.

Joe

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.