×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




> From: Phil Coulthard
>
> The primary differences in WSAD vs WSSD is advanced J2EE
> tooling, including exhaustive support for EJBs and MDBs.

This makes perfect sense to me, and if as you say WDScAEi is basically WDSC
+ the WSAD enhancements, then I'm all good.


> -WSSD (and hence WDSC std) has all the built-in test environments for 4.0,
> 5.0
> and 5.0 express. They both support TomCat if you install TomCat locally.

This was my big kicker, and what got me started on the whole comparison.
Had I not noticed that the test environments were missing from the standard
version, I wouldn't have even bothered with the posting.  For me, EJBs are
not an issue, and my position should be obvious vis-a-vis Webfacing support.

As it is, I'm glad I did bring it up, if for nothing else than to get the
right information.  Thanks for the clarification, Phil.

Joe


This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.