Good News Everybody!
The new search engine is LIVE!
Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.
|
> From: Phil Coulthard > > The primary differences in WSAD vs WSSD is advanced J2EE > tooling, including exhaustive support for EJBs and MDBs. This makes perfect sense to me, and if as you say WDScAEi is basically WDSC + the WSAD enhancements, then I'm all good. > -WSSD (and hence WDSC std) has all the built-in test environments for 4.0, > 5.0 > and 5.0 express. They both support TomCat if you install TomCat locally. This was my big kicker, and what got me started on the whole comparison. Had I not noticed that the test environments were missing from the standard version, I wouldn't have even bothered with the posting. For me, EJBs are not an issue, and my position should be obvious vis-a-vis Webfacing support. As it is, I'm glad I did bring it up, if for nothing else than to get the right information. Thanks for the clarification, Phil. Joe
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.