|
> From: Buck Calabro > > I wouldn't say that I have a better than average understanding, but I also > don't think it's as difficult as it appears at first blush. I'm not going to argue about your capabilities, Buck <grin>. You may not believe it, but you have a FAR better understanding of web application architecture than a large segment of IBM's target audience. The implied idea behind WebFacing is that an RPG programmer who doesn't even know how to spell IFS can, with just a little training, become proficient in web application design. You and I both know that's not the case. Is it difficult? Not particularly. Is it rocket science? Certainly not. But at the same time, there are plenty of programmers who can't really make the leap from RPG III to RPG IV, much less to ILE. Are these programmers going to be able to use WebFacing? Hardly. So that means that now a typical shop needs two programmers: the guy who writes the code, and the guy who WebFaces it. That's not the mantra IBM is selling. Because once you get to the point where you need a WebFacing expert, my approach makes so much more sense. PSC/400 generates a clean split between the OS/400 code and the JSP. The only new talent you need is someone who understands HTML and web design, and they're in charge of the UI. They don't give a hoot about RPG or DDS or green screens; they just manage the data on the web panel. And that guy is a lot easier to find (and a heck of a lot cheaper) than someone who knows WebFacing. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.