Re: Laser Printing from System 21 -- SYSTEM21

Kate,

Laser printers work quite well in the iSeries world.  I have several
clients where we have implemented HP, Xerox and IBM printers.  We use
duplex printing, tray control, and we print forms, overlays and graphics. 
The printers are setup as network printers using TCP/IP.

Check the following link for iSeris Support for Various ASCII Printers
http://www-912.ibm.com/s_dir/slkbase.NSF/acf2ee1e9d64b16e8625680b00020389/b44a2cf4ba778d83862568250053649f?OpenDocument

When you use Remote Outq's (RMTOUTQ) you can detemine the RMTPRTQ value at...
http://www-912.ibm.com/s_dir/slkbase.NSF/f99348d94b68f8708625661300765a6c/b49aa3cf3ce97d0d862565c2007d4393?OpenDocument


Note* these network printers can also be used by PC's and Network servers
(Windows, Linux, etc) at the same time.

Good luck,
  Jack
_______________________________________________
Jack Welch              ARIS, Inc.
welchj@xxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________

> We have had to change printers as a printer has broken down. However, we
> have opened a can of worms. It appears when we first implemented System
> 21,
> our only modifications were to do with printing. We could not get an
> appropriate skip on our new dot matrix printer, and we could solve this by
> playing around with the print file. However, if we had to change the
> printer
> again, we would have the same problem. We have been told that a HP or IBM
> laser printer would not have any of these problems. However, we are
> nervous
> of buying one now without some indication that it would work. Does anyone
> have the spec of a currently available HP or IBM laser printer that
> appears
> to work with System 21 without any difficult set up problems?
>
> Thanks,
> Kate Healy
> EI Electronics.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: system21-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:system21-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 12 February 2004 18:01
> To: system21@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: SYSTEM21 Digest, Vol 2, Issue 37
>
>
> Send SYSTEM21 mailing list submissions to
>       system21@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/system21
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       system21-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       system21-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of SYSTEM21 digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. RE: [SYSTEM21] Sales orders posted into the wrong period
>       (Michael Berman)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> message: 1
> date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:18:50 +1100
> from: "Michael Berman" <berman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> subject: RE: [SYSTEM21] Sales orders posted into the wrong period
>
> Yes,
> The flow on effect can be very dramatic.  Sometimes it may be better
> living
> with the problem for a month than spend 2-3 months cleaning up after it.
> I
> would recommend having a reconciling figure when trying to reconcile
> Inventory to GL and wait out the month.  Adding appropriate documentation
> so
> that the auditors don't complain too much.
>
> Please remember the AR Statements will also show the original Debit and
> correcting Credit then the Debit again!  You Customers will certainly
> become
> aware that something amiss had occurred.  You may need to consider a short
> note to go with the statements saying that there was a System Glitch.
>
> If we were to use words from the message file for the note on the
> statement,
> would it say, "A Problem Has Occurred - contact JBA/GEAC/someone who
> cares".
>
> Did we mention sales analysis, or the Debtor Average Days to pay etc??
>
> I always demanded a chocolate cake as a reward for correcting problems was
> caused by a User.  It helped morale, especially for those people spending
> valuable time cleaning up afterwards.
>
> Regards
>
> Michael Berman
>
> (m) 0419 324 558
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: system21-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:system21-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On
> Behalf Of Jeff Klipa
> Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2004 1:35 AM
> To: system21@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [SYSTEM21] Sales orders posted into the wrong period
>
> Oh the tangled web we weave...
>
> Let this be a warning to all of us out there...  This could happen to
> anyone
> of us at any time.
> If you've ever had this particular mess to clean up then you will
> appreciate
> where Gary is coming from right now...  Mike hit the nail squarely on the
> head...
>
> Since the period number for all SOP -> A/R invoice postings are based on
> the
> current Inventory calendar period, that means that all of Gary's Inventory
> movements and G/L valuations after week one of 10402 are posted to
> 10403...!!!
>
> Doh...!!!
>
> So INP95, INP96 and PCP01 and the explosion of files that the OSLMJ
> background job proliferates into (to name only a few) are 'infected' with
> the wrong period...  Talk about a domino effect...!  Assuming your using
> AFI
> the G/L will be carrying these valuations in the wrong period as well...
> So
> once you fix the A/R side as you have suggested your G/L will be thrown
> off
> again...  The accountants will not be able to balance the A/R with the
> Inventory...
>
> Ouch, what an ugly mess...!!!
>
> I suffered a similar event in 1997 when unbeknownst to me a user had
> actually closed the Inventory period twice...!!!  It took a while to
> realize
> the error but by then the damage was widespread throughout the database...
> I attempted to clean everything up but I was left with the nagging feeling
> that I never did find all of the files to fix...
>
> Needless to say I don't let the users populate the calendars or close the
> Inventory Period any more...  And, even though we have successfully
> automated the Inventory monthend close I still always log in and check the
> Inventory and Sales Analysis calendars to make sure the current period is
> set correctly before any users are allowed to post anything...
>
> An ounce of prevention IS better than a pound of cure for sure in this
> case...
>
> It's a good thing we have users to blame these kinds of things on...  ;8<)
> Have you audited your security for the Calendar Maintenance options
> lately...?
>
> Good luck Gary...
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: MLemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Reply-To: System 21 Users <system21@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: system21@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [SYSTEM21]   Sales orders posted into the wrong period
> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 08:25:20 -0500
>
> Did all of your inventory movements post to the correct period?  Each
> invoice/credit is almost guaranteed to be accompanied by some inventory
> movements in GL?  If you are correcting this via JE, then you may want to
> SQL the period in INP95/INP96.  I'm certain that there are inventory
> reports
> that look at the period in these files.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Shipp [mailto:gary.shipp@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 5:49 AM
> To: SYSTEM21@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [SYSTEM21] Sales orders posted into the wrong period
>
> A user at our company made an error when creating our calendar file for
> 2004, entering dates so that period 2 was only effectively only 1 week
> long
> and period 3 7 weeks.  Several sales invoice posting sessions were
> performed
> before anyone noticed the error.
>
> As a result, we now have a few thousand invoices in period 4/3 instead of
> 4/2.  The calendar has now been corrected, however, the accountants want
> the
> items moved into the right period.
>
> What I was intending to do is as follows;
>
>   1) Use the SL Interface to firstly credit each invoice currently in
> period
> 3, than create new invoices in period 2.  We realise that new invoice
> numbers will be created and are happy to put up with this.
>   2) SQL OEP65 and OEP70 to correct the period number from 10403 to 10402.
>
> Are there any other issues that I need to consider addressing?  Is simply
> SQL'ing OEP65 and OEP70 an acceptable solution to resolving the incorrect
> periods on the SOP side of things?
>
> Thanks for any help.
> --
> ________________________
> Gary Shipp
> (iSeries Development Project Manager)
> System Three Technology Ltd
> Tel:     01553 636792
> Fax:     01553 636414
> Mob:     07974 328454
> URL:    <www.s3t.co.uk> << <http://www.s3t.co.uk/> http://www.s3t.co.uk>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Create your own personal Web page with the info you use most, at My MSN.
> http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200364ave/direct/01/
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the System 21 Users (SYSTEM21) mailing list
> To post a message email: SYSTEM21@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/system21
> or email: SYSTEM21-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/system21.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the System 21 Users (SYSTEM21) digest list
> To post a message email: SYSTEM21@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/system21
> or email: SYSTEM21-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/system21.
>
>
>
> End of SYSTEM21 Digest, Vol 2, Issue 37
> ***************************************
> _______________________________________________
> This is the System 21 Users (SYSTEM21) mailing list
> To post a message email: SYSTEM21@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/system21
> or email: SYSTEM21-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/system21.
>
>