|
Joe, We have been using this feature for two years now and overall it works great. Issues we've encountered are operational and has to do with ways of working. Contact me privately if you have more specific questions. Hope this helps. Mona -----Original Message----- From: system21-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:system21-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2003 1:00 AM To: system21@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: SYSTEM21 Digest, Vol 1, Issue 531 Send SYSTEM21 mailing list submissions to system21@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/system21 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to system21-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx You can reach the person managing the list at system21-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of SYSTEM21 digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Contract Effective Date Pricing (Joe Roesch) 2. Credit Manager - Opt 43/ARP (Richard_Caldicott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- message: 1 date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 09:27:29 -0400 from: Joe Roesch <jroesch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> subject: [SYSTEM21] Contract Effective Date Pricing S21: V2.4 SP2.4 Module: VS Topic: Contract Effectivity Dates One of the exciting S21 enhancements is a Contract feature that allows multiple contract prices against the same item by effective date range in Vendor Scheduling. We are actively using Vendor Scheduling with the exception of this feature utilizing multiple items per contract with PO creation level = 1. All contract price related effective dates are to be populated within the full range (and not to precede/exceed) of the header contract start/end dates. We have tested but there is no substitute to experience. Has anyone encountered any anomalies using this feature? ------------------------------ message: 2 date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 09:31:20 -0500 from: Richard_Caldicott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx subject: [SYSTEM21] Credit Manager - Opt 43/ARP This option goes straight into the inquiry for the last accessed customer - obviously the customer number is being stored somewhere. I guess the intent of this option is to enable caller i.d. to pass the phone number to the system and identify the customer, populating the customer number so you simply take option 43 to load up the caller's details. Is anyone currently looking at this or is there someone out there that has actually done this? Richard ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ This is the System 21 Users (SYSTEM21) digest list To post a message email: SYSTEM21@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/system21 or email: SYSTEM21-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/system21. End of SYSTEM21 Digest, Vol 1, Issue 531 **************************************** ########################################### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.F-Secure.com/
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.