|
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Jeff, Whoa. What's the business reason for doing this? AFI? Can't we come up with another field to split out Part A from Part B? Doug In a message dated 12/5/2002 8:48:25 AM Central Standard Time, Jeff_Klipa/Harvard@harvardind.com writes: > We have a situation where we are running two different parts on PRESS1 and > we > want to be able to associate a different cost center to the work station we > call > PRESS1 depending on which part we are running on that work station... We > are > not using Work Centers. > > The only way I can think of is to double define the PRESS1 workstation as > PRESS1 > for one part and PRESSA for the other part... > > Is there a better way to do this...? > > Is there a problem if I do this...? > > Thanks in advance for your comments.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
