RE: Inventory Single step transfer (43/INP)

["Grinstead, Scott" <SAGrinstead@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Have you considered setting up two "areas" inside one warehouse? The reasons
I suggest this is that any move between two distinct warehouses will require
put-away processing to occur.  Just an extra step that might not be needed.




 -----Original Message-----
From:   GManoovaloo@ibl.intnet.mu [mailto:GManoovaloo@ibl.intnet.mu] 
Sent:   Monday, January 22, 2001 3:04 AM
To:     JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com
Subject:        Inventory Single step transfer (43/INP)

We are planning to implement  WH for a customer who has 2 stores
(stockrooms) : Bulk & Main store.
Each store would be declared as a warehouse . Items will often be moved
from Bulk to Main .
The  43/INP option seems, at present, the best option to reflect such a
movement, but since we do not know  WH enough, we would like to know the
impact this transaction may have in warehouse management.
Thanks for your valuable input .

Regards
Gilbert


+---
| This is the JBA Software Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message send your mail to JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to JBAUSERS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to JBAUSERS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: doug333@aol.com.
+---
+---
| This is the JBA Software Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message send your mail to JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to JBAUSERS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to JBAUSERS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: doug333@aol.com.
+---