I like the concept but your requirement to NOT store the Password Of the Day and generate it every time it's needed means you can't pick other external inputs to feed the process. For example you could call a web service to check the temperature in some known location as one bit of the seed, then check the water level in some river, toss in the cycle of the moon, and the date, mix in the percent full of the disks, and add a pinch of the faulting rate for the *BASE pool. Oh but all of those things change constantly except the date, rats. Maybe you could architect it so the P.O.D. is kept in a running program only and requested from that program. Each time the program starts or when some magic time each day occurs it generates the P.O.D and holds it. Just a thought.....

- DrFranken

On 6/11/2010 6:05 PM, Simon Coulter wrote:

Looking for suggestions:

I want to protect access to an application via a password. I want the
password to automatically change daily. I want the application to be
able to determine today's password without having to read it from an
external source (i.e., algorithmically/programmatically derived). This
last requirement means:

o no special profile with password changed daily
o no validation list use
o no encrypted password stored in external object such as *FILE or
*DTAARA

I envisage:
o Application objects are *PUBLIC *EXCLUDE
o Application objects are authorised to a specific group profile
o Password generator is *PUBLIC *EXCLUDE
o Password generator is authorised to a specific profile (different
from the above)

In actual use a user who is a member of the application group AND who
needs to use this particular application will request the password
from an authorised issuer. The issuer will use the password generator
to determine today's password. The user will then use the application.

The "automatic daily change" requirement means the password generation/
validation is tied to the date but obviously simple encryption linked
to the date will not be very secure nor will each daily password be
sufficiently different from the previous one.

I have some ideas but thought I would see what others suggest--always
presuming you think this sufficiently interesting to bother with :)

Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FlyByNight Software OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists

http://www.flybynight.com.au/
Phone: +61 2 6657 8251 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\
Fax: +61 2 6657 8251 \ /
X
ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------



_______________________________________________
This is the Security Administration on the AS400 / iSeries (Security400) mailing list
To post a message email: Security400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/security400
or email: Security400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/security400.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2021 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.