×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On 16/04/2009, at 4:15 AM, Mayer, Michael (CMA Consulting) wrote:
On 1 box, a PTF in a group shows as superseded and on the other box
that same PTF in the same group shows as permanently applied.
PTF's were installed about 2 weeks apart using the same instruction
set from IBM.
Does anyone know how this could occur?
The second machine had the permanently applied PTF installed before
applying the group PTF. The first machine did not.
Permanently applied means the PTF was loaded and applied (either
temporarily or permanently) and then a later PTF was installed.
Superseded means the PTF was never installed (or was but was removed)
and a later PTF was applied. THe supersede chain that is part of the
later PTF causes this effect.
Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FlyByNight Software OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists
http://www.flybynight.com.au/
Phone: +61 2 6657 8251 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\
Fax: +61 2 6657 8251 \ /
X
ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
