I would like to know if there is any impact from changing QPWDLVL (Password
level) from 0 to 2. As a reference:
0 = User profile passwords with a length of 1-10 characters are supported.
2 = User profile passwords with a length of 1-128 characters are
Also, according to the security reference, when using QPWDLVL=0, the rules
for specifying passwords are the same as those used for user profile names.
Because our network passwords are required to use special characters, it
would be nice if I could use the same password for the network and our
AS/400s. But I find that I am unable to use most special characters on my
So, if I make a suggestion to the sysadmins to change the QPWDLVL to 2, I
would like to be able to tell them that there is no impact for doing so.
I.e., users will not have to change their existing passwords, and the other
password-related system values still apply, and when users passwords expire,
they will be able to enter any password they would otherwise have been able
to when QPWDLVL=0. The *only* difference is that users *may* begin using
special characters in their passwords.
Hmmm, users would also need to remember that the passwords would be
case-sensitive. But they need to do that now with their network passwords,
so that shouldn't be a big issue.
Am I on the right track with this thinking?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.