RE: White Paper on OS/400 Virus Resistance

| -----Original Message-----
| [mailto:security400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Hall, Philip

| > -----Original Message-----
| > From: Patrick Botz [mailto:botz@xxxxxxxxxx]
| > Subject: RE: [Security400] White Paper on OS/400 Virus Resistance
| >
| > Phil,
| >
| > I thought we DID emphasis importance of the trusted translator.
|
| You did emphasis the importance, I just feel (and I think this is
| what I meant to say in my last email) that it needed to be
| emphasized *more* so. It's (re-translation at restore time) about
| the only thing you can rely upon, but I understand that even
| then, not 100%.
|
| --phil

I understand that, mathematically, nothing can be proven 100% anything.
(Thus, Sturgeon's Law...;-)-;

But how "not 100%" are you talking?  Dunno you can or wanna disclose 100% of
what you ARE talking about.  Also, I'd presume they're'd be enhancements in
"mythical" upcoming release, and I saw Something about enhancements to how
firmware gets upgrades or Something along those lines.  But do not recall
now if it was in press or a PR release or on a M-List ... ?