Re: confusing coding? -- RPG400-L

Subject: Re: confusing coding?
From: Patrik Schindler <poc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 09:12:52 +0200
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Hello James,

Am 04.08.2025 um 20:19 schrieb James H. H. Lampert via RPG400-L <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

So why is it doing explicit reads, in an explicit do-loop, essentially walking through the file, when it could have just ridden The Cycle through the file?

Simple: Because the programmer decided against it. :-)

Honestly, even I avoid using implicit cycling, because it's function not represented by code, which confuses me.

:wq! PoC

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: confusing coding? , Daniel Gross

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.