|
On Apr 11, 2025, at 7:41 AM, Justin Taylor <jtaylor.0ab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Agreed. Even if .NET is currently your intended audience, the first option
provides better flexibility for the future without requiring much extra
effort.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 3:34 AM cesco via RPG400-L <--
rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Wide question with obviously a lot of options and lot of context and
solution area, but being precisely so wide, let's stick to the two options
given, assuming you are talking about JSON over HTTP RPC style API.....
I'll pick the first, less moving parts, efficient, easier to debug, and
pretty performant if Apache straight to RPG. And - if one so desire - there
are native third party products for IBMi that offer the whole stack and
related orthogonal services (security, accounting, monitoring...).
The second doesn't add any visible value to me, the cost of such
dependency is much higher than the value given.
This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.