It's been a long, long time since I did anything with EOFDLY. As I recall, the file just sat there indefinitely waiting for a new record to be available. I don't recall a SETLL being needed. Maybe we used the PF and didn't care about the sequence of the records being processed? Does sequence matter to you?


On 5/5/2022 4:03 PM, Peter Dow wrote:
A further note on this issue:

In the below code, if I leave the F-spec as keyed, but change

    setll (*loval) ORDERH1;


    setll *start ORDERH1;

it pays attention to the EOFDLY.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.