× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 2:05 PM Alan Campin <alan0307d@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yea but string concating is slow, extremely error prone and very difficult
to read.

But your method of using your own homegrown, half-baked, ad hoc
templating minilanguage is "slow, extremely error prone and very
difficult to read" compared to a proper interpolation/templating
feature.

My point is, any argument based on "yeah, my way might not be AS nice,
but it's Nice Enough For Me (and thus should be nice enough for
everyone)" is not really a valid argument. Plenty of people find RPG
III much more than Good Enough already. To those people, why bother
wasting SO MUCH time, effort, and resource on RPG IV? No doubt there
are some (not many, but...) who find assembly language plenty good
enough. They can make the argument that, assuming they are really good
at it, their code produces smaller and faster executables than a
bloated monster like RPG III, so why do people waste so much effort
building so-called high-level languages?

John Y.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.