|
Why would anyone want to use *IMMED over *DEFER?with
We currently have most of our SRVPGMS in our binding directory defined
*IMMED but running into issues when the *SRVPGM is not in the librarywant
list. Upon pgm initialization, if the *SRVPGM's cannot be found in the
libl, the pgm blows up. But if we set it to *DEFER we would have an
opportunity on the first call to ADDLIBLE.
I know there are other ways to handle this, such as just specifying the
library in the binding directory along with the *SRVPGM but we don't
to do that.ADDLIBLE
Anyone see any issues with doing a mass *IMMED change to *DEFER and
recompiling our pgms? So that we may include this small step to
on first pgm call?
tia
Jay
--
This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: https://amazon.midrange.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.