|
On Aug 18, 2021, at 3:43 PM, Javier Sanchez <javiersanchezbarquero@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Also, personally I prefer the individual key fields because, suppose you
want to chain a record that would need a partial key value, in that case
you'd have to code a separate DS for that scenario. While the former, lets
you only add or rip out key fields, depending on your need.
message: 1
date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 12:41:03 -0400--
from: Jon Paris <jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: DS argument list for i/o vs. listing the arguments at the
i/o statement
Any performance difference (and I doubt there is any) would be
insignificant.
Jon Paris
This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.