× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Hi Buck

An example, kind of, of what I mentioned, that RCAC is like or actually is a WHERE clause being effected.

Although the doc Alan mentioned does say performance might go down, I think it depends, as all things SQL, on indexes and all. RCAC is used for SQL and RLA but the implementation under the covers does involve optimization, IIRC the explanation I heard when introduced.

Vern

On 5/13/2021 9:09 AM, Buck Calabro wrote:
On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 09:13, Jay Vaughn <jeffersonvaughn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

been on a research and testing initiative for months now - many tests.
Without any specifics on the tests, it's only a guess.
Here's a theory that uses exaggeration to spur discussion.

If the 'control' run is a READ that returns every field of a very wide
record (say 1000 fields in a 50 000 byte record), then each transfer
requires moving 50 000 000 bytes.
If the 'variant' run is a READ of those same records, but RCAC
restricts the user to just one field of 1 byte length, then each
transfer requires moving 1 byte.
--buck


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.